SummaryRMgm-609
|
Successful modification | The parasite was generated by the genetic modification |
The mutant contains the following genetic modification(s) | Gene mutation |
Reference (PubMed-PMID number) |
Reference 1 (PMID number) : 21262960 |
MR4 number | |
top of page | |
Parent parasite used to introduce the genetic modification | |
Rodent Malaria Parasite | P. berghei |
Parent strain/line | P. berghei ANKA |
Name parent line/clone | Not applicable |
Other information parent line | |
top of page | |
The mutant parasite was generated by | |
Name PI/Researcher | A. Coppi; P. Sinnis |
Name Group/Department | Department of Medical Parasitology |
Name Institute | New York University School of Medicine |
City | New York |
Country | USA |
top of page | |
Name of the mutant parasite | |
RMgm number | RMgm-609 |
Principal name | ∆Nfull |
Alternative name | |
Standardized name | |
Is the mutant parasite cloned after genetic modification | Yes |
top of page | |
Phenotype | |
Asexual blood stage | Not different from wild type |
Gametocyte/Gamete | Not different from wild type |
Fertilization and ookinete | Not different from wild type |
Oocyst | Mutant oocysts produced between 50 and 100% more sporozoites per oocyst compared with wild type oocysts. |
Sporozoite | Mutant oocysts produced between 50 and 100% more sporozoites per oocyst compared with wild type oocysts. However, salivary glands contained 10-fold lower numbers of salivary gland sporozoites compared to wild type. Mutant salivary gland sporozoites showed a higher invasion efficiency of hepatocytes in vitro compared with wild type. Mutant salivary gland sporozoites showed a higher infectivity in vivo after intravenous inoculation. After intradermal inoculation, most sporozoites did not reach the liver but were trapped in the skin. |
Liver stage | Mutant salivary gland sporozoites showed a higher invasion efficiency of hepatocytes in vitro compared with wild type. Mutant salivary gland sporozoites showed a higher infectivity in vivo after intravenous inoculation. After intradermal inoculation, most sporozoites did not reach the liver but were trapped in the skin. |
Additional remarks phenotype | Mutant/mutation Figure: A model for the role of CSP in the sporozoite's journey (from: Coppi et al., 2011, J. Exp. Med. 208, 341-56). Other mutants |
top of page | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Details of the target gene | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gene Model of Rodent Parasite | PBANKA_0403200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gene Model P. falciparum ortholog | PF3D7_0304600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gene product | circumsporozoite (CS) protein | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gene product: Alternative name | CS, CSP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
top of page | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Details of the genetic modification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short description of the mutation | deletion of entire N terminus excluding the signal sequence (including region I) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inducable system used | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short description of the conditional mutagenesis | Not available | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional remarks inducable system | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Type of plasmid/construct | Plasmid double cross-over | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PlasmoGEM (Sanger) construct/vector used | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modified PlasmoGEM construct/vector used | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plasmid/construct map | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plasmid/construct sequence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restriction sites to linearize plasmid | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selectable marker used to select the mutant parasite | hdhfr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Promoter of the selectable marker | pbdhfr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selection (positive) procedure | pyrimethamine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selection (negative) procedure | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional remarks genetic modification | In the mutant the wild type csp is replaced with a mutated csp containing a specific deletion of entire N terminus, (including region I) and excluding the signal sequence (amino acids NKSIQAQRNLNELCYNEGNDNKLYHVLNSKNGKIYNRNTVNRLLADAPEGKKNEKKNEKIERNNKLKQP. The mutant CSP gene was generated using a PCR-based approach. Two gene fragments flanking the region to be deleted and including engineered or endogenous restriction sites were amplified and cut to yield fragments that when ligated make a CSP mutant containing the desired deletion. For the ∆Nfull mutant, the amino acids NKSIQAQRNLNELCYNEGNDNKLYHVLNSKNGKIYNRNTVNRLLADAPEGKKNEKKNEKIERNNKLKQP, which encompass the entire N terminus excluding the signal sequence, were deleted as follows: a 5’ 722-bp fragment was amplified using forward primer P5 (5’-AAAAAAGGTACCAAATATTATATGC-3’; existing KpnI site underlined) and reverse primer P6 (5’-AGAGCAGCTCGCCATATCCTGGAAGTAGAG-3’; introduced PvuII site underlined). Next, a 776-bp 3’ CSP fragment was amplified using forward primer P3 (5’- AGCGTAATAATAAATTGAAACAAAGGCCTCCACCACCAAACCC- 3’; introduced StuI site underlined) and reverse primer P4 (5’- TTATTTAATTAAAGAATACTAATAC-3’; existing PacI site underlined). Both PCR products were gel purified, digested SspI and StuI (resp.) to remove region 1, and ligated. The correct PmlI-PacI ligation product was determined by pcr and subsequently sub-cloned, sequenced and cloned into the pCSComp transfection plasmid. To generate the final pCSRep targeting construct that would replace the endogenous CSP locus, a CSP 5’UTR targeting region was cloned upstream of the selection cassette in pCSComp. The 5’UTR targeting region was obtained from p9.5∆E by PCR using p9.5∆E specific primers (see article). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional remarks selection procedure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
top of page |