SummaryRMgm-404
|
Successful modification | The parasite was generated by the genetic modification |
The mutant contains the following genetic modification(s) | Gene disruption |
Reference (PubMed-PMID number) |
Reference 1 (PMID number) : 20573956 |
MR4 number | |
top of page | |
Parent parasite used to introduce the genetic modification | |
Rodent Malaria Parasite | P. berghei |
Parent strain/line | P. berghei ANKA |
Name parent line/clone | P. berghei ANKA 820cl1m1cl1 (RMgm-164) |
Other information parent line | P. berghei ANKA 820cl1m1cl1 (RMgm-164) is a reference ANKA mutant line which expresses GFP under control of a male and RFP under control of a female gametocyte specific promoter (PubMed: PMID: 19438517). |
top of page | |
The mutant parasite was generated by | |
Name PI/Researcher | R. Pastrana-Mena; B. Franke-Fayard; C.J. Janse; A.E. Serrano |
Name Group/Department | Department of Microbiology |
Name Institute | University of Puerto Rico-School of Medicine |
City | San Juan |
Country | Puerto Rico, USA |
top of page | |
Name of the mutant parasite | |
RMgm number | RMgm-404 |
Principal name | 1513cl1 |
Alternative name | Δgr4 |
Standardized name | |
Is the mutant parasite cloned after genetic modification | Yes |
top of page | |
Phenotype | |
Asexual blood stage | Not different from wild type |
Gametocyte/Gamete | Not different from wild type |
Fertilization and ookinete | Not different from wild type |
Oocyst | Mutant oocysts numbers in Anopheles stephensi, counted at day 10-12 post infection, were slightly lower than those produced by wild type parasites and the size of mutant oocysts at day 10-12 was significantly smaller compared to the size of wild type oocysts with a maximum size that is comparable to immature 6-8 days wt oocysts. The small oocysts that are present at day 10-12 showed a highly vacuolated cytoplasm and the absence of sporozoite formation. No sporozoites were observed in A. stephensi salivary glands at day 21-22 post infection |
Sporozoite | The small oocysts that are present at day 10-12 showed a highly vacuolated cytoplasm and the absence of sporozoite formation. No sporozoites were observed in A. stephensi salivary glands at day 21-22 post infection |
Liver stage | Not tested |
Additional remarks phenotype | Mutant/mutation In order to examine whether blood stage parasites can survive without de novo synthesis of GSH and without a functional GR attempts were performed to disrupt the γ-gcs in a mutant lacking GR expression. For these experiments the ∆gr3 (RMgm-403) mutant was generated which lacks a drug-selectable marker to enable us to take advantage of the γ-gcs disruption construct which contains the tgdhfr selectable marker (RMgm-204). The drug selectable marker, a fusion of the hdhfr and yfcu genes, was removed from the genome by negative selection with 5-fluorocytosine. Three attempts to disrupt the γ-gcs gene using two different constructs (pL1217, pL1223) in the ∆gr3 mutant were unsuccessful whereas wild type parasites were readily transfected with the same constructs (RMgm-204). In addition, attempts were performed to disrupt the gr gene in γ-gcs mutants (∆γ-gcs1,2; RMgm-204) with construct a construct containing the hdhfr as a selectable marker, allowing selection of mutants using treatment with WR99210. In 5 attempts it was not possible to select parasites with both the γ-gcs and the gr genes disrupted. These results indicate that the maintenance of cytosolic GSH levels needed for blood stage survival requires either de novo GSH synthesis or the formation of GSH through reduction of GSSG by a Plasmodium GR. These results also strongly suggest that blood stage parasites cannot depend solely on host-derived GSH and GR for their GSH metabolism.
|
top of page | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Details of the target gene | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gene Model of Rodent Parasite | PBANKA_1023400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gene Model P. falciparum ortholog | PF3D7_1419800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gene product | glutathione reductase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gene product: Alternative name | GR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
top of page | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Details of the genetic modification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inducable system used | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional remarks inducable system | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Type of plasmid/construct used | Plasmid double cross-over | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
PlasmoGEM (Sanger) construct/vector used | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modified PlasmoGEM construct/vector used | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plasmid/construct map | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plasmid/construct sequence |
AATTCACTGGCCGTCGTTTTACAACGTCGTGACTGGGAAAACCCTGGCGTTACCCAACTT
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restriction sites to linearize plasmid | HindIII, EcoRI, PvuI | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Partial or complete disruption of the gene | Complete | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional remarks partial/complete disruption | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selectable marker used to select the mutant parasite | hdhfr/yfcu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Promoter of the selectable marker | eef1a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selection (positive) procedure | pyrimethamine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selection (negative) procedure | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional remarks genetic modification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional remarks selection procedure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Primer information: Primers used for amplification of the target sequences
Primer information: Primers used for amplification of the target sequences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
top of page |