Successful modification | The parasite was generated by the genetic modification |
The mutant contains the following genetic modification(s) |
Gene disruption
|
Reference (PubMed-PMID number) |
Reference 1 (PMID number) : 15520375 |
MR4 number |
|
top of page |
Parent parasite used to introduce the genetic modification |
Rodent Malaria Parasite | P. berghei |
Parent strain/line | P. berghei ANKA |
Name parent line/clone |
Not applicable
|
Other information parent line | |
top of page |
The mutant parasite was generated by |
Name PI/Researcher | K. Kadoto, M. Yuda |
Name Group/Department | School of Medicine |
Name Institute | Mie University |
City | Mie |
Country | Japan |
top of page |
Name of the mutant parasite |
RMgm number | RMgm-134 |
Principal name | maop(-)1; maop(-)2; maop(-)3 |
Alternative name | |
Standardized name | |
Is the mutant parasite cloned after genetic modification | Yes |
top of page |
Phenotype |
Asexual blood stage | Not different from wild type |
Gametocyte/Gamete | Not different from wild type |
Fertilization and ookinete | Mutants showed normal exflagellation numbers and developed into mature ookinetes in vitro and in the midgut of A. stephensi mosquitoes. Ookinetes did not show any morphological differences from wild-type parasites. Mutant ookinetes cannot invade midgut epithelial cells as was shown by light microscopic analysis. Ookinetes cannot rupture the cell membrane of the midgut epithelial cell as was shown by electron microscopic analysis. Analysis of ookinete invasion/traversal showed that wild type ookinetes had invaded the midgut epithelium, and over half of them were attached to the basal lamina. The epithelial cells initially invaded by ookinetes were heavily damaged. They were characterized by high electron density staining, protrusion from the epithelium, absent or scant microvilli, and degeneration of cytoplasmic organelles such as mitochondria.
In contrast, mutant ookinetes were found neither in the cytoplasm of the midgut epithelial cell nor beneath the basal lamina. All of the mutant ookinetes were located outside the epithelium, and over the half of them adhered to the membrane of the epithelial cell, attaching their apical tip to epithelial cell surface. The epithelial cell surface where the ookinete attached was invaginated toward the cytoplasm, but no apparent breakage was observed in the extended cell membrane. The attached epithelial cells were kept intact, as shown by staining of normal electron density, dense microvilli, retention of the complex structure of the basal membrane labyrinth, and intact cytoplasmic organelles. |
Oocyst | No oocysts are formed. Mutant ookinetes cannot invade and traverse midgut epithelial cells (see phenotype 'Fertilization and ookinete'). |
Sporozoite | Not tested |
Liver stage | Not tested |
Additional remarks phenotype | Mutant/mutation
The mutant lacks expression of MAOP (membrane attack ookinete protein; Membrane Attack Complex; MAC/perforin, putative; Plasmodium perforin like protein 3; PPLP3)
Protein (function)
The maop/pplp3 gene is a member of a small, conserved family of proteins encoding perforin-like proteins containing membrane-attack complex/perforin domains (MACPF)(Kaiser, K et al., 2004, Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 133, 15-26). MAOP is specifically expressed in the ookinete and shows an micronemal location (micronemes).
Phenotype
The phenoype analyses indicate a role of MAOP in the invasion of the ookinetes of the midgut epithelial cells. Ookinetes can migrate to the gut epithelium and attach to the cell surface at the apical tip, but cannot enter the cytoplasm because of loss of the ability to disrupt the cell membrane.
Additional information
Other mutants
Mutants that lack expression of other members of the PPLP protein family:
RMgm-135, RMgm-137: Mutants lacking expression of SPECT2/PPLP1
RMgm-123: A mutant lacking expression of PPLP5
See also RMgm-92 for an unsuccessful attempt to disrupt PPLP4
|